From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26563 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2002 09:18:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26556 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2002 09:18:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Nov 2002 09:18:18 -0000 Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id JAA23248; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 09:18:16 GMT Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5) id xma022389; Wed, 27 Nov 02 09:17:24 GMT Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (pc960.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.205.4]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA06736; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 09:17:23 GMT Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (rearnsha@localhost) by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id gAR9HNE29771; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 09:17:23 GMT Message-Id: <200211270917.gAR9HNE29771@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> X-Authentication-Warning: pc960.cambridge.arm.com: rearnsha owned process doing -bs To: Andrew Cagney cc: Kris Warkentin , Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Organization: ARM Ltd. X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd) X-Fax: +44 1223 400410 X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ. Subject: Re: ARM stack alignment on hand called functions In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 26 Nov 2002 17:01:00 EST." <3DE3EF1C.8090003@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 01:18:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00389.txt.bz2 > > > So perhaps this is a FIXME for us for later. The thing is, there isn't any > > QNX specific code down this path so I suspect this alignment issue is a > > generic gdb problem. Once we finish up with this release, the plan is to > > port our QNX modifications to the gdb head branch for eventual inclusion in > > the generic release. > > Can I suggest downloading a current GDB snap and find out if the problem > is still present (and if it isn't, follow through with a patch)? > Otherwize this will slip through the cracks, only to re-bite you (and > others) later :-( > > Andrew > > I can see no evidence that the current code is correct either, so perhaps we should file a PR with all this info. R.