Re: [RFA] Replace strdup with xstrdup in tic30-dis.c

Klee Dienes
2002-11-21T06:56:13Z

Was the final decision from the earlier discussion as simple as:

typedef int bfd_boolean;

s/boolean/bfd_boolean
s/true/1
s/false/0

and deal with the fallout? If so, I'm willing to do the conversion and
post a patch.

(After all, it's been almost a week since I broke GAS for some
processor I've never heard of. What fun is that?)

On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 06:08 PM, Alan Modra wrote:

>>> I'm not arguing against a "no xmalloc in new code" rule, just that an
>>> unchecked xmalloc is better than an unchecked malloc.
>>
>> Which reminds me, how is the elimination of true/false from "bfd.h"
>> going?
>
> Has that become my job?? ;)