From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-11038-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 1903 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2002 07:30:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 1896 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2002 07:30:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO postfix3.ofir.com) (193.0.243.238)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Nov 2002 07:30:34 -0000
Received: from webmail5.ofir.dk (unknown [192.168.197.25])
	by postfix3.ofir.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F1B5B205
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 08:55:27 +0100 (CET)
X-WM-Posted-At: webmail5.ofir.dk; Wed, 13 Nov 02 08:30:28 +0100
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:30:00 -0000
From: James Sampson <i_am_triumph@ofir.dk>
To: GDB Archive <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
X-EXP32-SerialNo: 00002117
Subject: RE: I'm sorry but....
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20021113075527.E2F1B5B205@postfix3.ofir.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2

>===== Original Message From Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> =====
> Hello Andrew
>
>
>>Can you expand?  Which `docs' exactly and why?
>
>
> When you need info about the mailing list and how it works, you have to
> communicate via email to a bot which replies on your commands, but is pretty
> slow at best and don't give precise answers - Since I didn't have the time 
to
> wait, I had to try out some options while waiting for an answer :-D

Ah, that interface I've never used (I've used listserv and majordomo in
the past though).

Any way, can you post this to gdb@.

Andrew


>>The http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/mailing-lists/ page (like most others)
>>has a payload of ~10k (5k text + 5k image).  That's pretty light and
>>I've found it pretty snappy across the slowest of links (I'm told web
>>designers get given a per-page payload of ~100k, outch!).
>
>
> I have no problem there either - Only thing that bothers me is the very
> limited search option - I might post something there similar to another guys
> post, but I have no way of knowing since I manually have to check the 
mailing
> list for similar topics - Of course there may be a smarter way, but I 
haven't
> found it yet :-D
>
> Cheers,
>
> James
>
>
>