From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] File-I/O, target access to host file system via gdb remote protocol enhancement
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 13:24:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021112212526.GA28814@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021111131354.N10395@cygbert.vinschen.de>
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:13:54PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this RFC tries to introduce a remote protocol enhancement, which
> already has been implemented at Red Hat. The idea is to allow
> the remote target (which likely has no own file system at all)
> to access the host file system to store and retrieve data from
> a gdb session, as if the hosts filesystem is local to the target.
This is a great thing. I remember using similar functionality both for
debugging and for running certain unnamed industry benchmarks...
> A second part of this implementation is to map the basic stdio
> streams (file descriptors 0-2) to the gdb console, to enable
> the user to serve a remote target application interactively.
> This should work in gdb's CLI as well as in the GUI.
I like this one too; but I'm not sure that I like linking it to the
remote-syscall interface. Implementation-wise, that's the most useful
method for a stub like RedBoot; but for a larger system like gdbserver,
it's useful to allocate the program a normal pseudo-terminal as if it
had a console. And to do character rather than line I/O.
As I'm sure Andrew will remind me, my suggestion doesn't fit the
current remote protocol very well; it's not synchronous enough for one
thing. So don't take this as an objection, and I'll come back to
proper remote console support a little later. This'll be a nice
starting point.
> B.3 struct stat
>
> The buffer of type struct stat used by the target and GDB is defined
> as follows:
>
> struct stat {
> unsigned int st_dev; /* device */
> unsigned int st_ino; /* inode */
> mode_t st_mode; /* protection */
> unsigned int st_nlink; /* number of hard links */
> unsigned int st_uid; /* user ID of owner */
> unsigned int st_gid; /* group ID of owner */
> unsigned int st_rdev; /* device type (if inode device) */
> unsigned long st_size; /* total size, in bytes */
> unsigned long st_blksize; /* blocksize for filesystem I/O */
> unsigned long st_blocks; /* number of blocks allocated */
> time_t st_atime; /* time of last access */
> time_t st_mtime; /* time of last modification */
> time_t st_ctime; /* time of last change */
> };
>
> The integral datatypes are conforming to the definition in B.1 so this
> structure is of size 64 bytes.
Ick, 32-bit st_ino... why bother to transfer it if you say "no meaning
for the target"?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-12 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-11 4:14 Corinna Vinschen
2002-11-11 22:01 ` [RFC] File-I/O, target access to host file system via gdb , " Eli Zaretskii
2002-11-12 0:40 ` Corinna Vinschen
2002-11-12 13:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
[not found] ` <20021113143522.T10395@cygbert.vinschen.de>
2002-11-13 6:30 ` [RFC] File-I/O, target access to host file system via gdb " Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-11-13 6:52 ` Corinna Vinschen
2002-11-13 7:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-11-13 7:44 ` Corinna Vinschen
2003-02-26 21:19 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021112212526.GA28814@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox