From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6015 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2002 14:06:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5985 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2002 14:06:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Nov 2002 14:06:14 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 188inI-0004eG-00; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 09:05:36 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 188hsb-000332-00; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 09:07:01 -0500 Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 06:06:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Triumph The insult comic dog Cc: GDB Archive Subject: Re: Error message? Message-ID: <20021104140700.GA11529@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Triumph The insult comic dog , GDB Archive References: <20021104081755.232F856491@postfix3.ofir.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021104081755.232F856491@postfix3.ofir.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 08:54:46AM +0100, Triumph The insult comic dog wrote: > I have the following problem, when downloading to target with gbd. I don't > understand what the error 00000x00000000 in ?? () means... : > > > (gdb) > Sending packet: $Hc-1#09...[+]Ack > [$][O][K][#][9][a]Packet received: OK > Sending packet: $qC#b4...[+]Ack > [$][#][0][0]Packet received: > Sending packet: $qOffsets#4b...[+]Ack > [$][#][0][0]Packet received: > Sending packet: $?#3f...[+]Ack > [$][S][0][5][#][b][8]Packet received: S05 > Sending packet: $Hg0#df...[+]Ack > [$][O][K][#][9][a]Packet received: OK > Sending packet: $g#67...[+]Ack > [$][0][0][0][0][#][c][0]Packet received: 00000x00000000 in ?? () It's: "Packet received: 0000" "0x00000000 in ?? ()" Is 0000 really a full response to the 'g' packet? Seems unlikely. > Loading section .text, size 0x400 lma 0x401000 > > Sending packet: $X401000,0:#13...[+]Ack > [$][O][K][#][9][a]Packet received: OK > binary downloading suppported by target > Sending packet: $X401000,0:#13...[+]Ack > [$][O][K][#][9][a]Packet received: OK > Sending packet: $X401000,0:#13...[+]Ack > [$][#][0][0]Packet received: > > > .... Help!!!. > > > -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer