Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: wim delvaux <wim.delvaux@adaptiveplanet.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: why is gdb 5.2 so slow
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 19:51:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021101035218.GA14509@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021101013219.QDL1261.amsfep12-int.chello.nl@there>

On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 02:32:19AM +0100, wim delvaux wrote:
> I have been working with gdb 4.xx for years.
> 
> because of the dynamic library breakpoint handing I moved to 5.2 only to find 
> it VERY slow.  I wrote this mail because I just had to kill gdb because it 
> consumed 100 % cpu for MINUTES without doing anything usefull.
> 
> I run debian (testing version with the latests versions) I have currently 
> installed 5.2.cvs 2002081.
> 
> Kernel version 2.4.18
> 
> I must admin that I do not have the fastest workhorse imaginable (a PIII 800) 
> but that used to be no problem.
> 
> I also sometimes use ddd 3.1 with gdb and again in the 4-version I had no 
> problem, executing was crips, debugging (almost) fun.
> 
> Now it skips breakpoints, takes ages to skip to the next statement, sometimes 
> does not even want to stop (because it refers to some missing thread or 
> something).  Only killing is the solution.
> 
> PLEASE help me out here !!!!

We can't help you unless you give us more information, of course.

What are you doing?  If you're complaining about slowness, you're
probably working with multithreaded applications.  Yeah, it's slower,
but better.  Every once in a while I work on making it faster but I
haven't had much success yet.

It should not spin for minutes on its own.  What were you telling it to
do?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


  reply	other threads:[~2002-11-01  3:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-31 17:32 wim delvaux
2002-10-31 19:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-11-01  5:31   ` wim delvaux
2002-11-01  6:58     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-11-01  7:15       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-11-01  8:55         ` Andrew Cagney
2002-11-01 10:14           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-11-01 10:32             ` Andrew Cagney
2002-11-01 10:44               ` Kevin Buettner
2002-11-01  7:15       ` wim delvaux
2002-11-01  7:17         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-11-01  8:13           ` wim delvaux
     [not found]       ` <redirect-4290038@silicondust.com>
2002-11-01  8:36         ` Nick Kelsey
2002-11-01 11:43 Howell, David P
2002-11-01 12:46 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-11-04 12:44   ` Jim Blandy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021101035218.GA14509@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=wim.delvaux@adaptiveplanet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox