From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29322 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2002 19:07:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29235 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2002 19:07:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Oct 2002 19:07:33 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 186z7G-0008E7-00; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:07:02 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 186yCK-0005bc-00; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:08:12 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:07:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Kris Warkentin Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gnu-v3-abi.c: problems w/ virtual base class Message-ID: <20021030190812.GA21527@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Kris Warkentin , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <120101c28037$3ddb3d10$d8020c0a@catdog> <20021030172051.GA27733@nevyn.them.org> <121101c2803a$005145e0$d8020c0a@catdog> <20021030173438.GA8741@nevyn.them.org> <122501c2803c$2e278450$d8020c0a@catdog> <123101c28044$f5386340$d8020c0a@catdog> <123d01c28046$8cfbe660$d8020c0a@catdog> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <123d01c28046$8cfbe660$d8020c0a@catdog> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00212.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:00:02PM -0500, Kris Warkentin wrote: > > I found the naughtiness. auto_solib_add is true on Neutrino but not on > > Windows. Guess who defines _Zero in their libc? We do!! > > > > Actually Daniel, before I let you go, can you offer any suggestions on how > to resolve this? The part of our libc that defines _Zero is third party > (Dinkum) and we're not super keen on monkeying with it. What is the > rationale for using a symbol starting with _Z as an autodetection for > v3-abi? Are there some symbols defined by gcc-3.x that start with _Z? I'm > just wondering if there might be some better way of dealing with this - > perhaps have a special note in gnu-v3 binaries. This could be handy for > linkers as well for resolving library versionitus. See my other message for a suggestion... All mangled names from the v3 compiler start with _Z. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer