From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20231 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2002 18:37:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20213 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2002 18:37:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sapphire.nj.caldera.com) (63.124.204.226) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Oct 2002 18:37:32 -0000 Received: (from jlw@localhost) by sapphire.nj.caldera.com (8.9.3/UW7.1.1) id OAA04962; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:37:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:37:00 -0000 From: John Wolfe Message-Id: <200210231837.OAA04962@sapphire.nj.caldera.com> To: jlw@caldera.com, jimb@redhat.com Subject: Re: Petr Sorfa's Dwarf 2 changes Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-MD5: 8465XL1Q1QO5ZnBB0j0rug== X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00168.txt.bz2 > From jimb@zenia.red-bean.com Wed Oct 23 13:53:43 2002 > John, could you post a copy of your current dwarf2read.c, with all > your changes --- approved, unapproved, and unsubmitted --- in place? > > I'm undertaking some related work in dwarf2read.c which will almost > certainly conflict with Caldera's changes, and I'd like to see where > you guys ended up. Arrrgh, just resynching with the top-of tree. I was incorporating Petr's original patch http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-07/msg00066.html in 3 distinct steps, so that what I submitted at any step would/could stand-alone. There were some struct member name changes and I noticed that the new lookup routines did not consider multiple .dwarf_info sections (shared object), so I am revising them. I will have the full patch incorporated and retested by Friday noon. Will that be sufficient?