From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6633 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2002 19:01:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6615 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2002 19:01:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (66.30.22.225) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Oct 2002 19:01:58 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 271D21BF27; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:03:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 12:01:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Cc: Kevin Buettner , fv@epitools.com Subject: Re: libremote status? Message-ID: <20021009190302.GB31260@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com, Kevin Buettner , fv@epitools.com References: <3D2F20B9.20208.10CBA01@localhost> <3DA34315.26790.1AD0844@localhost> <1021009163952.ZM20907@localhost.localdomain> <20021009184235.GB11605@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021009184235.GB11605@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00092.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 02:42:35PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 09:39:53AM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote: >I assume that, given the name change, there is no plan for RDA to be >contributed to the FSF? And that, as such, there can be no effort to >combine all this beautiful server architecture with the fact that we >have a working gdbserver implementation, and active development on it? We will not be releasing this to the FSF, no. We still need to hold the copyright for various reasons. cgf