From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12620 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2002 22:50:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12608 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2002 22:50:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nerodeguest) (24.161.107.98) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Oct 2002 22:50:48 -0000 Received: from neroden by nerodeguest with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17wVml-0004ZZ-00; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 18:46:35 -0400 Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 15:50:00 -0000 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: top level makefile.in Message-ID: <20021001224634.GA17565@doctormoo.dyndns.org> References: <20021001104833.E25369@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20021001012213.GA16275@nevyn.them.org> <20021001114136.F25369@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <3D99C4A0.30205@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D99C4A0.30205@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Nathanael Nerode X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 11:52:00AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:22:13PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > >>On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:48:33AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote: > > > >>> pepper:/usr/tmp/ppc/bin# make install > >>> /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs /usr/local /usr/local > >>> ./mkinstalldirs: ./mkinstalldirs: No such file or directory > >>> make: *** [installdirs] Error 127 > >>> > >>> What's the idea of putting > >>> > >>> srcdir = . > >>> > >>> in the top level Makefile.in? Surely you don't expect everybody > >>> to run autogen? > > > >> > >>Well, there's some complication here - Nathaniel had a working patch > >>in, and Andrew reverted it because it broke GDB's (and binutils'...) > >>make -f Makefile.in gas.tar.bz2 hack. > > > > > >Frankly, I'd rather have those broken than "make install". :) > > > >2002-09-29 Andrew Cagney > > > > Revert below (note that src does not contain Makefile.tpl): > > > >And _that_ comment isn't true. At least as of a few minutes ago, > >/src does contain Makefile.tpl. Hmm, I see Nick has been hacking on > >Makefile.in too, which is now a generated file. > > The're not listed in `:ext:sources.redhat.com:/cvs/src CVSROOT/modules' > under src-support. > > Nathanael, which top-level files now need to be included. > > Andrew Makefile.tpl, Makefile.def, and src-release should be included. Eek. You need to revert the change to 'configure' corresponding to my reverted change to Makefile.tpl/Makefile.in, until everyone's using src-release and my changes can be put back in full; the partial reversion is the cause of the build breakage. --Nathanael