From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-10639-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 13812 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2002 18:21:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 13804 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2002 18:21:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Sep 2002 18:21:50 -0000
Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail)
	by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17v0gC-0000MG-00; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:21:36 -0500
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17uzkW-0004B7-00; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:22:00 -0400
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 11:21:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''
Message-ID: <20020927182200.GA16046@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>,
	Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
References: <3D938E6F.6090809@redhat.com> <2427-Fri27Sep2002201112+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <3D94A16E.6010409@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3D94A16E.6010409@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00482.txt.bz2

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 02:20:30PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >>Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 18:47:11 -0400
> >>From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
> >>
> >>I'd like to float the idea of moving all the generic dummy frame code 
> >>into a new file dummy.[hc].
> >
> >
> >Yes, but I'd suggest to call the files something other than dummy.*,
> >lest someone thinks they are junk ;-)
> 
> But then I can't have a function called ``dummy_spit()'' (OZ? expression 
> for blowing one's fuse).
> 
> More seriously, I'm struggling for a better name: ``generic'' ``gdf'' 
> ``dummy-frame'', ...  I guess the last one?

I think dummy-frame works well.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer