From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3320 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2002 02:35:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3273 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2002 02:35:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Sep 2002 02:35:09 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8H2I9d24794; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 22:18:10 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8H2Z7d25445; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 22:35:07 -0400 Received: from dot.sfbay.redhat.com (dot.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.7]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8H2Z6C17009; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 19:35:06 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by dot.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8H2Z6p19579; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 19:35:06 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: dot.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 19:35:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Elias Athanasopoulos Cc: Pierre Habraken , binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com, Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Section .debug_info in object file Message-ID: <20020917023506.GF19508@redhat.com> References: <3D806189.7A45FCBA@imag.fr> <20020912220303.A1134@neutrino.particles.org> <20020912205434.GA20375@redhat.com> <20020915124258.A1134@neutrino.particles.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020915124258.A1134@neutrino.particles.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00213.txt.bz2 On Sun, Sep 15, 2002 at 12:42:58PM +0300, Elias Athanasopoulos wrote: > Also, about my previous patch, gcc includes the DW_AT_name field in > .debug_abbrev, but gas does not. So, readelf expects to find a DW_AT_name > field in .debug_info section, which is created by gas. No it doesn't. readelf prints the .debug_info+.debug_abbrev sections exactly as presented. The existence of DW_AT_name makes no difference one way or the other. r~