From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14460 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2002 09:28:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14396 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2002 09:28:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Sep 2002 09:28:45 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8E9Bxw16317 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 05:11:59 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8E9Shd30230 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 05:28:43 -0400 Received: from cygbert.vinschen.de (vpn50-7.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.7]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8E9SaC26417 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 02:28:37 -0700 Received: (from corinna@localhost) by cygbert.vinschen.de (8.11.6/8.9.3/Linux sendmail 8.9.3) id g8E9SWm23439 for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 11:28:32 +0200 Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 02:28:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Expect fails to recognize regexp Message-ID: <20020914112832.K1574@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20020913200643.I1574@cygbert.vinschen.de> <15746.11507.688049.368955@localhost.redhat.com> <20020913232250.J1574@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20020913220215.GB22097@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020913220215.GB22097@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00182.txt.bz2 On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 06:02:15PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Are you sure you're in the right branch of the IF? Does a send_user > there get displayed? Thanks, David! This was the important hint. The ena-dis-br.exp test defines it's own rerun_to_main procedure, which is absolutely identical to the rerun_to_main proc in gdb.exp. I removed the proc from ena-dis-br.exp and everythings fine now with my patch. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Developer Red Hat, Inc. mailto:vinschen@redhat.com