From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16780 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2002 06:07:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16773 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2002 06:07:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www.lampret.com) (193.189.173.98) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 2002 06:07:18 -0000 Received: from vili ([212.118.94.130]) by www.lampret.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g898p9Q25288; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 07:51:09 -0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Marko Mlinar To: Andrew Cagney Subject: Re: Merging OC gdb with official gdb Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2002 23:07:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200209041256.47379.markom@opencores.org> <3D77B310.50009@ges.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3D77B310.50009@ges.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200209090807.04987.markom@opencores.org> X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00049.txt.bz2 Andrew, > The current documentation is being updated (slowly). Also see the thread: > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2002-07/msg00202.html > > but unless your architecture is really wierd, nothing should be needed. no, it is very similar to PPC, it is very clean RISC implementation. > - getting it to strictly use the multi-arch framework (the exception > being if your platform has shared libraries) I don't quite understand what you mean with "if your platform has shared=20 libraries", can you rephrase please. I saw multi-arch framework would require a lot of work for our target, it=20 would be nice if we could make it without it. We have following deprecated macros: #define EXTRACT_RETURN_VALUE(TYPE, REGBUF, VALBUF) #define STORE_RETURN_VALUE(TYPE,VALBUF) #define EXTRACT_STRUCT_VALUE_ADDRESS(REGBUF) Is it possible to solve them without multi-arch? > - getting it to comply to gnu (and GDB) coding standards of course. > - FSF paperwork already have it. > Otherwize it should drop in. Take a look at one of the very recent > targets (xstormy16?). ok. thanks for your help, Marko