From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31826 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2002 17:44:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31819 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2002 17:44:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Sep 2002 17:44:33 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17mf8t-0001oU-00 for ; Wed, 04 Sep 2002 13:44:43 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17meCd-0002aD-00 for ; Wed, 04 Sep 2002 13:44:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 10:44:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Much of remote-utils obsolete now? Message-ID: <20020904174431.GA9914@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20020830211711.GA19488@nevyn.them.org> <3D763421.2050701@apple.com> <20020904162918.GA4532@nevyn.them.org> <3D763FE7.7080706@ges.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D763FE7.7080706@ges.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 01:16:23PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 09:26:09AM -0700, Stan Shebs wrote: > > > >>Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >> > > > >>>remote-utils.[ch] claim to be generic support functions, but except for > >>>some > >>>stray calls in remote-array.c which could be easily removed, all the > >>>references were in the now-obsolete remote-bug.c module. I'd like to see > >>>this code die too, especially the undocumented and pretty much useless > >>>"remote" command. > >>> > > > >>remote-utils was obsolete several years ago, and I bet not one single > >>person has used > >>remote-array in five years at least. > > > > > >Well, then :) Andrew, sounds like we have some more obsoletion > >candidates. > > Yep. My obsolete queue has maxed out though (until after 5.3 has been > released and I've zapped any of the current stuff). > > Perhaphs bug report it so that someone remembers to ``accidently > deleted'' when the i960 stuff goes in ~2 months. Check. It's gdb/685. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer