From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19789 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2002 10:57:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19779 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2002 10:57:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www.lampret.com) (193.189.173.98) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Sep 2002 10:57:10 -0000 Received: from vili ([212.118.94.130]) by www.lampret.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g84DgWQ12298 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 12:42:33 -0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Marko Mlinar To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Merging OC gdb with official gdb Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 03:57:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200209041256.47379.markom@opencores.org> X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 Hi! At opencores (www.opencores.org) we have a gdb-5.0 port to our or1k=20 architecture. We would like to join our sources into official version. Your current BFD already has needed or32 support. I have seen, that gdb went thought many internal changes, like regcache, et= c. I've looked at documentation, and it is outdated. Although there are promis= ing=20 mails, like below one ;), there is not enough info for me to break through. ------------ From: Andrew Cagney To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 13:49:07 -0500 Richard what follows is the short obscure answer (sorry). I'll try to=20 do the long (add to documentation answer, in about a week - this really=20 does need to be documented. ------------ I would like to ask you, if anybody is willing to help me update our curren= t=20 version of gdb or at least take a quick look at it and tell me how things=20 should work not. http://www.opencores.org/cvsweb.shtml/or1k/gdb-5.0/ thanks for your help, Marko