From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 516 invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2002 22:16:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 498 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2002 22:16:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (66.30.22.225) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Aug 2002 22:16:38 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 67ADE1B887; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 18:16:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 15:16:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Peter Barada Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 5.3 Branch 4th Sept 00:00 GMT Message-ID: <20020829221635.GF23580@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Peter Barada , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <3D6E3FCE.5080500@ges.redhat.com> <20020829210022.GE23580@redhat.com> <200208292108.g7TL8ep10818@hyper.wm.sps.mot.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200208292108.g7TL8ep10818@hyper.wm.sps.mot.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00405.txt.bz2 On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 05:08:40PM -0400, Peter Barada wrote: > >>Personally, I'd consider the bug that I posted earlier today to be a >>show stopper since it has the possibility of causing a SEGV from doing >>a simple gdb operation. Or, maybe I'm the only person around who does >>a "display /i $pc"... > >I seriously doubt that. I use disp/i $pc all the time (its especially >helpful for debugging Linux kernel TLB miss code, or figuring out >where my experimental ColdFire compiler generates incorrect code). Feel free to doubt it, especially without reading the bug report. cgf