From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4311 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2002 14:26:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4304 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2002 14:26:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Aug 2002 14:26:35 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17iFOI-0001RT-00; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 09:26:22 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17iFOy-0004f5-00; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:27:04 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 07:26:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Quality Quorum Cc: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: Two small remote protocol extensions Message-ID: <20020823142704.GA17903@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Quality Quorum , Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <3D659C93.4030807@ges.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00286.txt.bz2 On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 10:24:28AM -0400, Quality Quorum wrote: > > > On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > Lets get rid of the easy one (...) `Hg': > > > > `` > > > > @item @code{Hg}@var{id} --- set general thread > > @cindex @code{Hc} packet > > > > Select the general thread. Register and memory read and write > > operations apply to the most recently selected general thread. > > > ????? Memory is shared between threads, isn't it so ???? > > IMHO, a multi-process debugging is a very different animal from a > multi-thread debugging and lumping them together only creates more > problems. Registers aren't, though. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer