Re: RFC: Two small remote protocol extensions

Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-05-03T22:22:13Z

On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 06:18:51PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> If you're holding onto the thread you're effectively synchronous. The
> exchanges:
>
> <- n<new-thread>
> -> +
>
> and
>
> <- T00<new-thread>
> -> +$C#..
> <- +
>
> are, only marginally different.
>
> Should all threads be halted during this exchange? I think that is a
> separate question.

I wouldn't call it effectively synchronous - precisely because no other
thread is stopped. All threads shouldn't be halted, IMO, but I have
no way to tell GDB which are and which are not.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer