Re: HP catchpoint code

Andrew Cagney
2002-11-07T23:24:27Z

> In summary, I'd rather yank it; mark the bits in HP-specific files as
> //OBSOLETE; and go on to support this feature on what seems to be a
> more useful and supported platform to GDB's current user and maintainer
> base.

How many bits of the HP-specific code work at all?

When someone cuts a branch, a common mistake is to go off and start
doing all sorts of stuff, but never actually finish it. I'm wondering
how much of the code you're looking at falls into that category and can,
as a consequence, simply be yanked.

> Does anyone else have an opinion? If the consensus is that I'm out of
> line, I guess it's time to go back to an older working tree and start
> renaming...

No, but someone did blink :-)

Andrew