From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27922 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2002 14:15:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27914 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2002 14:15:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Aug 2002 14:15:37 -0000 Received: from dsl254-114-118.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.254.114.118] helo=nevyn.them.org ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17co4h-0006VX-00; Thu, 08 Aug 2002 09:15:39 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17co4z-00019i-00; Thu, 08 Aug 2002 10:15:57 -0400 Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 07:15:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdbserver/ChangeLog? Message-ID: <20020808141557.GA4426@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <3D527C82.1040500@ges.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D527C82.1040500@ges.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00063.txt.bz2 On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 10:13:22AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Daniel, > > Should there be a gdbserver/ChangeLog? I was recently doing some code > archology and was finding that the presence of gdbserver entries in > gdb/ChangeLog was making things mighty confusing. Often the same > function/variable appears but in a totally different context. Hmm, I think that's a good idea. Is it worth moving entries from the old ChangeLogs, or just starting a new one for future changes? -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer