From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31827 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2002 20:13:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31819 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2002 20:13:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Jul 2002 20:13:29 -0000 Received: from dsl254-114-118.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.254.114.118] helo=nevyn.them.org ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17VHeQ-0001RY-00; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 15:13:26 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17VHeT-0006Ae-00; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 16:13:29 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 13:13:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Daniel Berlin Cc: Paul Dubuc , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: catchpoints Message-ID: <20020718201329.GA15774@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Berlin , Paul Dubuc , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20020718200450.GA13992@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00186.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 04:09:01PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 04:00:43PM -0400, Paul Dubuc wrote: > > > I'm using gdb 5.2 on Solaris 8 to debug code compiled with g++ 2.95.3. > > > When I try to enter 'catch throw' or 'catch catch' commands I get a > > > message that says > > > > > > no runtime support for this > > > > > > Does this mean I need to rebuild gdb to support these commands or is it > > > just that they aren't supported for this OS or compiler? > > > > > > I can't find any info in the manual about this. > > > > I believe they're only supported on HP/UX (and none of the HP/UX > > support works quite right any more...). I don't think anyone has tried > > to implement them on GCC code yet. > > Actually, I did, and had it working just fine. > It's actually not that difficult, but it is ABI specific. Have you still got the code to do this? I'd like to see it. Although I've got a pretty good idea how it's done now that I look over the code. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer