From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18166 invoked by alias); 13 Jul 2002 17:05:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18158 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2002 17:05:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) (66.187.233.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Jul 2002 17:05:34 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (vpn50-2.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.2]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g6DH5Xs06258 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 13:05:34 -0400 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 705B51C359; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 13:05:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 10:05:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: libremote status? Message-ID: <20020713170544.GC30143@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <3D2F20B9.20208.10CBA01@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D2F20B9.20208.10CBA01@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00140.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 06:32:25PM -0700, Fred Viles wrote: >In the archives I found the following comment by Eric Bachalo in the >thread "libremote activation" from November 2000: > >| First, apologies for not getting libremote sources out to the public >| yet. We fully plan to release all libremote sources to the public in >| the near future. The only reason we haven't to date is a lack of >| available resources to do it properly. >| >| Libremote is our effort to make a standard framework under a single >| set of sources for handling GDB remote protocol on the target side. >| We plan on releasing the code under a BSD like license. This will >| eliminate worries of linking this code with third party proprietary >| libraries. >| >| Eric Bachalo >| Director of Engineering >| Red Hat, Inc. > >libremote doesn't appear to be publicly released yet, but in the "OCD >Support" thread last January Peter Reilley says Macraigor will be >using it in the future. > >Other than these threads, I find very little mention of libremote at >all. So my question is, what is the status of the libremote project? Coincidentally enough, it should be released within the next month. We've been slowly clearing up various minor issues, like the actual released name of the product and we've been cleaning up some minor interface odds and ends. You can blame me for this, since I wanted to make sure that there were no outstanding issues before it was released. (and saying this has certainly jinxed things now) Sorry for the delay. It will be coming soon to a repository near you. Christopher Faylor Engineering Manager Red Hat, Inc.