From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32409 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2002 14:54:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32366 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2002 14:54:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Jun 2002 14:54:46 -0000 Received: from cs2876-108.austin.rr.com ([24.28.76.108] helo=branoic) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17MVEb-0007rn-00; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 09:54:29 -0500 Received: from drow by branoic with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17MVE7-0001DY-00; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 10:53:59 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 07:54:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michal Ludvig Cc: gdb , Mark Kettenis Subject: Re: dwarf2 unwinding for i386 Message-ID: <20020624145358.GB3804@branoic.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michal Ludvig , gdb , Mark Kettenis References: <3D172112.1050108@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D172112.1050108@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00216.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 03:39:30PM +0200, Michal Ludvig wrote: > Hi all, > what do you think about adding dwarf2 unwinding (dwarf2cfi.c) to i386 > target? On x86-64 we are already using it for some time now and it seems > to be quite stable. GCC folks are about to switch omit-frame-pointer on > by default for i386 in a near future, but are waiting (as I understand > it) for GDB to implement dwarf2 unwinding, so that the resulting code > could be debugged. Can we make at least a testing branch with this > support? Opinions? MarkK? If we do this, IMHO, we should support it for all architectures and not for just x86-64 and i386. Everyone wins. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer