From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22813 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2002 18:23:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22803 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2002 18:23:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.19.120.64) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Jun 2002 18:23:35 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Ivk2-0005Es-00 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 14:24:10 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:23:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [MI] -break-insert: (a)synchronous? Message-ID: <20020614182410.GA20123@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <3D0A1AE0.4030209@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00111.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 10:49:53AM -0700, Keith Seitz wrote: > On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > This means another MI version bump (currently it is on 1). See how mi0 > > vs mi1 was handled (especially in the testsuite). > > I'll take care of it. Unless I hear otherwise, I will modify the code to > support old and new. Are we going to set a date or time limit on > deprecating the old mis? Please? In particular, I don't want us to keep accumulating testsuites for different protocol versions forever. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer