From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4335 invoked by alias); 28 May 2002 12:50:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4312 invoked from network); 28 May 2002 12:50:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.alinoe.com) (24.132.80.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 May 2002 12:50:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 29717 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2002 12:50:20 -0000 Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 05:50:00 -0000 From: Carlo Wood To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb bugs showing while working on libcwd Message-ID: <20020528145020.A17748@alinoe.com> References: <20020524114149.A2793@redhat.com> <20020524184234.A22858@alinoe.com> <20020525033302.A20587@alinoe.com> <20020525014055.GA27211@branoic.them.org> <20020527034255.A25457@alinoe.com> <20020527060329.GA5078@branoic.them.org> <20020527144220.A16085@alinoe.com> <20020527180451.GA5523@branoic.them.org> <20020528020101.A12154@alinoe.com> <20020528081656.GB5390@branoic.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020528081656.GB5390@branoic.them.org>; from drow@mvista.com on Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:16:56AM -0400 X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00305.txt.bz2 On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:16:56AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > By the way, if that includes a v3 demangler - there are three failures > in the demangler testsuite on v3 for functions taking function pointers > that I can't wrap my head around... :) Would replacing __cxa_demangle in libiberty with a demangler that does v3 demangling (and only v3 demangling) do the job? I am not familiar with this libiberty interface that seems to support a dozen different mangling styles. -- Carlo Wood