From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-9037-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 25024 invoked by alias); 27 May 2002 12:42:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 25001 invoked from network); 27 May 2002 12:42:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.alinoe.com) (24.132.80.10)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 May 2002 12:42:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 10904 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2002 12:42:20 -0000
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 05:42:00 -0000
From: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gdb bugs showing while working on libcwd
Message-ID: <20020527144220.A16085@alinoe.com>
References: <20020522115242.C28512@redhat.com> <20020523153816.A4454@alinoe.com> <20020524114149.A2793@redhat.com> <20020524184234.A22858@alinoe.com> <20020525033302.A20587@alinoe.com> <20020525014055.GA27211@branoic.them.org> <20020527034255.A25457@alinoe.com> <20020527060329.GA5078@branoic.them.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20020527060329.GA5078@branoic.them.org>; from drow@mvista.com on Mon, May 27, 2002 at 02:03:29AM -0400
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00292.txt.bz2

On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 02:03:29AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Of course it is; it's in a namespace.  Really, I don't expect any of
> what you're doing to work right now.  My first stab at fixing it was a
> complete disaster, too...

That would make sense if NOTHING worked that was in a namespace.
But in many cases it does.  I trust you if think this is related
to namespaces being unsupported, but never say 'of course'.

Because the whole standard resides in std::, this must be the
reason that gdb is virtually unusable with C++ :/

(gdb) p result
$2 = {static npos = Cannot access memory at address 0x8416bc4

(gdb) p buf
$1 = {<basic_iostream<char,std::char_traits<char> >> = {<basic_istream<char,std::char_traits<char> >> =
{<basic_ios<char,std::char_traits<char> >> = {<ios_base> = {static boolalpha = Cannot access memory at address 0x0

But if you ask me, it is more related to static members than
to namespaces...

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>