From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 821 invoked by alias); 26 May 2002 01:40:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 779 invoked from network); 26 May 2002 01:40:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (213.93.114.42) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 May 2002 01:40:20 -0000 Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2]) by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g4Q1eIo00495; Sun, 26 May 2002 03:40:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g4Q1eIc01015; Sun, 26 May 2002 03:40:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis) Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 18:40:00 -0000 From: Mark Kettenis Message-Id: <200205260140.g4Q1eIc01015@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> To: ac131313@cygnus.com CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3CDF328E.5000100@cygnus.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Sun, 12 May 2002 23:27:10 -0400) Subject: Re: Towards truly multi-arching the i386 References: <200205122204.g4CM4HU27541@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <3CDF328E.5000100@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00282.txt.bz2 Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 23:27:10 -0400 From: Andrew Cagney See: http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/onlinedocs/gdbint_15.html#SEC117 http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/onlinedocs/gdbint_15.html#SEC153 OK, I just posted something to gdb-announce. > Mark > > Supported targets > ----------------- > > i386-*-aout* > i386-*-coff* > i386-*-elf* These three should be identical. Not quite. i386-*-elf* uses a register numbering scheme for stabs (stabs-in-ELF to be precise) that differs from traditional stabs used for a.out and COFF. > i386-*-freebsd* > i386-*-linux* > i386-*-msdosdjgpp* > i386-*-netbsdelf* > i386-*-netbsd* > i386-*-netware* Can this go? I think it is the old old Novell thing. Right now it's only supported as a target, and it was really trivial to add. So I'll keep it. > i386-*-openbsd* > i386-*-pe* ChrisF would like the PE deleted! It's been bug reported. Ah, well, it's basically identical to i386-*-aout* and i386-*-coff*. The only "support" is the line in configure.tgt. I'll leave it to Chris to decide what to do with it. > i386-*-solaris* Canonicalized to i386-pc-solaris2 > i386-*-sysv4* > i386-*-vxworks* > > To be supported > --------------- > > i386-*-cygwin* > i386-*-isc* Issue with START_INFERIOR_TRAPS_EXPECTED What is this machine? > i386-*-lynxos* I think this can go (or at least an attempt made). I'll leave it alone for now. > i386-*-sco3.2v5* Several issues > i386-*-sco* Issue with START_INFERIOR_TRAPS_EXPECTED > i386-*-sysv4.2* UNIXWARE define, ptid issues > i386-*-sysv5* UNIXWARE define, ptid issues > i386-*-sysv* Issue with START_INFERIOR_TRAPS_EXPECTED > > Redundant targets > ----------------- > i386-ncr-* Caught by i386-*-sysv4* > > Obsolete targets > ---------------- > > i386-sequent-bsd* > i386-sequent-sysv4* > i386-sequent-sysv* > i386-*-aix* > i386-*-bsd* > i386-*-mach3* > i386-*-os9k Obsoleting os9kread is on the to do list as well. Yup! > i386-*-osf1mk* > i386-*-sco3.2v4* Broken Have fun! I'll probably start making a real mess next weekend ;-). I hope it'll be acceptable that some targets will be broken for a few days. I don't think I can keep things compiling without resorting to one large mega-patch. Mark