From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-8970-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 28511 invoked by alias); 17 May 2002 16:31:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 28467 invoked from network); 17 May 2002 16:31:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 May 2002 16:31:41 -0000
Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id RAA21482; Fri, 17 May 2002 17:31:39 +0100 (BST)
Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5)
	id xma021093; Fri, 17 May 02 17:31:08 +0100
Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.1.91])
	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA04618;
	Fri, 17 May 2002 17:31:06 +0100 (BST)
Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18])
	by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA21279;
	Fri, 17 May 2002 17:31:06 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200205171631.RAA21279@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com,
        Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Organization: ARM Ltd.
X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd)
X-Fax: +44 1223 400410
X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ.
X-Url: http://www.arm.com/
Subject: Re: pseudo registers in the regcache 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 17 May 2002 12:22:39 EDT."
             <3CE52E4F.70009@cygnus.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 09:31:00 -0000
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00225.txt.bz2


> > How about renaming the 68k stuff as being MEMORY_REGS and reserving the 
> > PSEUDO concept for what we really seem to want -- a view of a (or a 
> > combination of) physical (or memory) register(s)?
> 
> Or update mc68hc11 :-)

Well, I was hoping to avoid something that would be regarded as a majorly 
invasive change (and which I've no chance of testing).  Reclassifying the 
mc68hc11 pseudos as memory registers would avoid that (basically it would 
be a search and replace type operation ;-).

R