From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-8966-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 9371 invoked by alias); 17 May 2002 14:51:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 9363 invoked from network); 17 May 2002 14:51:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 May 2002 14:51:19 -0000
Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id PAA00181; Fri, 17 May 2002 15:51:17 +0100 (BST)
Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5)
	id xma029424; Fri, 17 May 02 15:50:38 +0100
Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.1.91])
	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA18783;
	Fri, 17 May 2002 15:50:37 +0100 (BST)
Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18])
	by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA07950;
	Fri, 17 May 2002 15:50:36 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200205171450.PAA07950@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>,
        gdb@sources.redhat.com
Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Organization: ARM Ltd.
X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd)
X-Fax: +44 1223 400410
X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ.
X-Url: http://www.arm.com/
Subject: Re: read_register_byte can't work with pseudo-reg model 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 17 May 2002 14:13:50 BST."
             <200205171313.OAA26418@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 07:51:00 -0000
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00221.txt.bz2


rearnsha@arm.com said:
> Would the following tweak be acceptable?  That is, only do the update
> if the register has a name.

>   else if (REGISTER_NAME (regnum) != NULL && *REGISTER_NAME (regnum)
> != '\0')
>     {
>       /* Is this register completely within the range the user is
> writing?  */
>       if (myregstart <= regstart && regend <= myregend)
>         write_register_gen (regnum, myaddr + (regstart - myregstart));

>       /* The register partially overlaps the range being written.  */
>       else
>         { 



I've just noticed that read_register_bytes is doing almost exactly this.  
Why do the two differ?

R.