From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-8930-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 14632 invoked by alias); 16 May 2002 12:19:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 14601 invoked from network); 16 May 2002 12:19:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 May 2002 12:19:37 -0000
Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id NAA03228; Thu, 16 May 2002 13:19:34 +0100 (BST)
Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5)
	id xma002740; Thu, 16 May 02 13:19:12 +0100
Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.1.91])
	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA13989;
	Thu, 16 May 2002 13:19:11 +0100 (BST)
Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18])
	by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA16585;
	Thu, 16 May 2002 13:19:10 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200205161219.NAA16585@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>,
        gdb@sources.redhat.com
Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Organization: ARM Ltd.
X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd)
X-Fax: +44 1223 400410
X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ.
X-Url: http://www.arm.com/
Subject: Re: read_register_byte can't work with pseudo-reg model 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 15 May 2002 15:43:33 EDT."
             <3CE2BA65.4090001@cygnus.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 05:19:00 -0000
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00185.txt.bz2


> I'm guessing. Try:
> 
> 	if (REGISTER_READ_P ())
> 	  {
> 	    do something fairly sane;
> 	  }
> 	else
> 	  {
> 	    all the legacy cruft including the call to
> 	    legacy_read_register_gen() and that test.
> 	  }
> 
> Thing is that there is only one target in the FSF using 
> READ_REGISTER_P() so there is this dividing line - something using 
> read_register_p() can be given far stronger requirements than for the 
> older code.

Which target is that, and where is READ_REGISTER_P ?  I can't find 
anything in the either the source or the mailing lists.  Mind you, the 
web-based mailing list search even fails to find your message when I 
search for READ_REGISTER_P.

R.