From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-8871-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 23287 invoked by alias); 12 May 2002 15:30:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 23237 invoked from network); 12 May 2002 15:30:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 May 2002 15:30:30 -0000
Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id QAA27230; Sun, 12 May 2002 16:30:28 +0100 (BST)
Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5)
	id xma027064; Sun, 12 May 02 16:29:51 +0100
Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.1.91])
	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA01688;
	Sun, 12 May 2002 16:29:50 +0100 (BST)
Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18])
	by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA02940;
	Sun, 12 May 2002 16:29:50 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200205121529.QAA02940@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Organization: ARM Ltd.
X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd)
X-Fax: +44 1223 400410
X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ.
X-Url: http://www.arm.com/
Subject: Re: ARM and virtual/raw registers 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 12 May 2002 11:25:23 EDT."
             <3CDE8963.9020506@cygnus.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 08:30:00 -0000
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00126.txt.bz2


ac131313@cygnus.com said:
> And fixing remote.c is on the hit list (I should fix Daniel's bug) :-)
>  It already has an internal table that does a mapping only it is 1:1.
> remote.c is complicated, however.  The mapping will need to be defined
>  at run (and not compile) time - this makes trying to perform
> transformations (and not simple mappings) on the way through more
> difficult. 

Surely it only has to select one of several pre-compiled mappings that is 
appropriate for the target processor configuration.

R.