From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23956 invoked by alias); 1 May 2002 03:56:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23918 invoked from network); 1 May 2002 03:56:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 May 2002 03:56:07 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 172lDu-0002uz-00 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 23:56:10 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 20:56:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Release schedule Message-ID: <20020430235610.A11126@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200204301624.g3UGOCp24280@duracef.shout.net> <3CCF2937.4050209@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CCF2937.4050209@cygnus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00513.txt.bz2 On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 07:31:03PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >Which branches are CURRENT and NEXT coming from? > > Er, yes. > > >Is CURRENT going to be gdb 5.2.1 from gdb_5_2-branch, > >with NEXT coming from the trunk? > > > >I'm trying to get a feel for how active the 5.2 branch will be. > > My expectation is: > - 5.2.1 from 5.2 branch in ~1-2 months > - ``current'' would be the 5.3 branch, ~4 months > - ``next'' would be the 5.4/6.0 branch, ~8 months > > CURRENT NEXT > >Warning: Sun Jul 14 (2002-07-14-gmt) Sun Nov 10 (2002-11-10-gmt) > >Branch: Sun Jul 28 (2002-07-28-gmt) Sun Nov 24 (2002-11-24-gmt) > >Release: Sun Sep 1 (2002-09-01-gmt) Sun Dec 29 (2002-12-29-gmt) > >reSpin: Sun Oct 6 (2002-10-06-gmt) Sun Feb 2 (2003-02-02-gmt) > > However, given GDB has actually managed two releases in 6 months and a > recent thread on this list suggests GCC is considering slowing down to 8 > month schedules, now is proably the time to ``re-negotiate'' GDB's > release schedule. Do we want to persue the 6.0 idea you mentioned earlier? Perhaps six months rather than four? -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer