From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-8709-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 22320 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2002 17:00:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 22311 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2002 17:00:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Apr 2002 17:00:45 -0000
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 171s2j-0003oq-00; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 13:00:57 -0400
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 10:00:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Correct machine name in config/m68k/tm-nbsd.h
Message-ID: <20020428130057.A14518@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>,
	gdb@sources.redhat.com
References: <4.2.0.58.20020425123916.016f4370@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <20020424102300.B6310@nevyn.them.org> <4.2.0.58.20020425123916.016f4370@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <3.0.6.32.20020426002406.01062100@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <20020425190715.A31091@nevyn.them.org> <8962-Sun28Apr2002195138+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8962-Sun28Apr2002195138+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00478.txt.bz2

On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 07:51:38PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 19:07:15 -0400
> > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
> > 
> > I believe that "made available in a public CVS" counts as "released"
> > for these purposes.
> 
> No, it doesn't.  A release is what we all know it to be: a tarball on
> ftp.gnu.org, with an appropriate announcement on related news groups.

Really?  In that case, is there any harm in adding extra years -
if there were it would seem like not releasing in a given year could
have all sorts of legal tangles for all added copyright dates.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer