From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Multi-arch only GDB 6.0 ....
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:15:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020418211607.A16989@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CBF6BEF.2050003@cygnus.com>
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 08:59:27PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> >It's a nice idea, but can we really ditch all the non-multi-arch targets?
> >I think you filed bugs about them all at one point; could you give an
> >exact list of the targets that would be going?
>
> Lets turn the question around.
>
> Why should GDB 6.0 retain support non-multi-arch targets? If someone
> needs to debug a non-multi-arch target they can download GDB 5.x.
Let me be clearer; I think there are some targets we need to allow time
to fix ourselves based on userbase, rather than on maintained-ness. I
would wager that GDB on Alpha has a fair number of users, and it seems
to work relatively well. If they prove unreasonably difficult to
multi-arch, well, that's a different story.
> For current status, see the file src/gdb/MAINTAINERS. Hmm, the ARM
> entry is out-of-date! The ones marked as ``OBSOLETE candidate'' are
> first up.
>
> >I'm stuck maintaining GDB for Debian right now. In our current
> >release, that's 11 architectures. I think that at the least Sparc,
> >Alpha, and m68k are non-multi-arch (and HPPA is non-contributed, but
> >there's nothing I can do about that...). We may be able to talk David
> >into cleaning up Sparc, but at the other two are also still in active
> >use. I think that we need to allow more time in order to get as many
> >targets as possible converted over - I'll do the two I mentioned myself
> >if no one else has time, but it'll take a while.
>
> The SPARC is multi-arch, Alpha is WIP, m68k had an expression of
> interest, HP/UX is typically broken.
Most of SPARC is only multiarch if it snuck in with David's cleanups
recently. A day-old tree:
tm-sp64.h:#define GDB_MULTI_ARCH GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL
tm-sp64linux.h:#define GDB_MULTI_ARCH 0
tm-sun4sol2.h:#define GDB_MULTI_ARCH GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL
Someone was working on HP/UX just a little while ago - Jeff Law, I
think.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-19 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-18 17:08 Andrew Cagney
2002-04-18 17:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-18 17:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-18 18:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-04-18 18:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-19 0:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-19 2:35 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-04-19 7:22 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-04-19 8:01 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020418211607.A16989@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox