From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25584 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2002 16:31:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25546 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2002 16:31:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc52.attbi.com) (216.148.227.88) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Apr 2002 16:31:01 -0000 Received: from ocean.lucon.org ([12.234.143.38]) by rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020418163101.DLTX1901.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@ocean.lucon.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 16:31:01 +0000 Received: by ocean.lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 194C5125C2; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:30:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:31:00 -0000 From: "H . J . Lu" To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Michael Veksler , Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb 5.2 removes the conditional breakpoints Message-ID: <20020418093059.A20868@lucon.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from eliz@is.elta.co.il on Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 02:08:41PM +0300 X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00309.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 02:08:41PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Michael Veksler wrote: > > > Your argument that "5,2 has been around for ~4 > > years" does not hold water, how many people have been using 5.2 ? > > You misunderstood: Andrew said that between 4.17 and 5.2, all versions of > GDB had this bug. Those versions in between are in use for 4 years, not > version 5.2 (which wasn't released yet). > Between 4.17 and 5.2, 4.18 and 5.0 are basically broken for Linux. I only started using 5.1 a few months ago. For me, this regression is relatively new to my gdb. H.J.