From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29033 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2002 17:17:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29026 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2002 17:17:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Apr 2002 17:17:25 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16wndH-0002MT-00 for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2002 13:17:43 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 10:17:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Switch ARM, SPARC and i386 to generic dummy frames (PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY)? Message-ID: <20020414131743.A9060@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <3CB99778.4050403@cygnus.com> <20020414111854.A4874@nevyn.them.org> <3CB9A15D.8030807@cygnus.com> <20020414115322.A5825@nevyn.them.org> <3CB9B0E4.8050203@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CB9B0E4.8050203@cygnus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00244.txt.bz2 On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 12:40:04PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >Sorry, you've lost me. BTW, the line: > > > >>>> - generic: looks for the FP in the list of dummy frames > > > >>isn't a typo. > > > > > >Certainly. But didn't you say "fix the first one (search for the PC)"? > > > >My concern is if we have multiple call frames from (to?) the same PC. > >That's easy enough to do; I've done it by accident plenty of times. > > Sorry, you've still lost me. > > PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY() returns non-zero if the PC is in a ``call dummy'' > (any call dummy). Having multiple call dummies at the same address is > normal (as with AT_ENTRY). That answers my question then :) -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer