From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13023 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2002 13:20:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12990 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2002 13:19:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Apr 2002 13:19:59 -0000 Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id OAA17740; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 14:19:56 +0100 (BST) Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5) id xma017197; Tue, 9 Apr 02 14:19:07 +0100 Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA01104; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 14:18:55 +0100 (BST) Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18]) by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA01886; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 14:19:06 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <200204091319.OAA01886@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> To: Christopher Faylor cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Organization: ARM Ltd. X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd) X-Fax: +44 1223 400410 X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ. X-Url: http://www.arm.com/ Subject: Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] "gdb-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com" gatewayed to "bug-gdb at gnu dot org" In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 09 Apr 2002 09:08:11 EDT." <20020409130811.GB2005@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 06:20:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00123.txt.bz2 > Huh? How will this cause anything to show up in usenet that wouldn't already > have been there? The only usenet groups that I'm aware of are the ones at > gmane.org. > > For the record, no one was posting anything to gdb-bugs prior to this. I was under the impression that all the bug-@gnu.org lists were mirrored onto the gnu..bug usenet groups. R.