From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2624 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2002 13:08:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2612 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2002 13:08:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) (66.187.233.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Apr 2002 13:08:17 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (vpn50-15.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.15]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g39D8EM23459; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 09:08:14 -0400 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 050A91BF80; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 09:08:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 06:08:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Cc: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] "gdb-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com" gatewayed to "bug-gdb at gnu dot org" Message-ID: <20020409130811.GB2005@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <3CB2684A.9080300@cygnus.com> <200204091251.NAA29257@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200204091251.NAA29257@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00122.txt.bz2 On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:51:21PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote: >But doesn't this mean that everything we now post to gdb-bugs will get >splatted onto usenet, where all those spam-bots will start garnering email >addresses? Huh? How will this cause anything to show up in usenet that wouldn't already have been there? The only usenet groups that I'm aware of are the ones at gmane.org. For the record, no one was posting anything to gdb-bugs prior to this. cgf