From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28330 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2002 05:29:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28321 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2002 05:29:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) (66.187.233.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Mar 2002 05:29:04 -0000 Received: from cgf.cipe.redhat.com (cgf.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.1.172]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g2T5T3N02817; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 00:29:03 -0500 Received: (from cgf@localhost) by cgf.cipe.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.8.7) id g2T5TDR23113; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 00:29:13 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 21:29:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Message-ID: <20020329052913.GA22971@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20020328034552.GB23767@codesourcery.com> <20020328015346.A27639@molenda.com> <20020328090029.B55362@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020328090029.B55362@dragon.nuxi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00304.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 09:00:29AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: >On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 01:53:46AM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote: >>>On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Zack Weinberg wrote: >>>>>>(E.g. it takes about 10x longer to do "cvs update" on the 3.0 branch >>>>>>than the trunk.) >>>>>Yeah, what's up with that? (I thought it was just me.) >> >>The cvs server on sourceware uses an optimization (a patch written by >>Ian Lance Taylor) to cache the information needed for a cvs update in a >>single file per directory. > >How about a *REAL* optimization, such as not locking ,v files for >anoncvs users?? The last time you suggested this, I offered to send you the source code for the version of cvs that is being run on sources.redhat.com. And, I suggested that if you would like to rebuild cvs, verify that it works, and be available for bug reports for your changes, I'd be willing to install your new cvs binary on the system. Why haven't you taken me up on my offer? cgf