From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22545 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2002 15:17:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22501 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2002 15:17:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) (66.187.233.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Mar 2002 15:17:06 -0000 Received: from cgf.cipe.redhat.com (cgf.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.1.172]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g2SFH3N07474; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 10:17:03 -0500 Received: (from cgf@localhost) by cgf.cipe.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.8.7) id g2SFHBe12156; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 10:17:11 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 07:17:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Jason Molenda Cc: Gerald Pfeifer , overseers@gcc.gnu.org, Zack Weinberg , "Kaveh R. Ghazi" , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com, rth@redhat.com Subject: Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Message-ID: <20020328151711.GB11781@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Jason Molenda , Gerald Pfeifer , overseers@gcc.gnu.org, Zack Weinberg , "Kaveh R. Ghazi" , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com, rth@redhat.com References: <20020328034552.GB23767@codesourcery.com> <20020328015346.A27639@molenda.com> <20020328020102.A31507@molenda.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020328020102.A31507@molenda.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00297.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 02:01:02AM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote: >On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 01:53:46AM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote: > >> None that I know of. cvs logging bites. We do track the # of >> bytes being sent/received from different hosts and the frequency >> with which hosts connect. The host that downloaded the most number >> of bytes last week by anoncvs? A purdue.edu site. Two redhat.com >> and one suse.de sites make the top six; an IP# and a cable modem >> (rogers.com) finish out the top six. Not very useful without some >> idea what repository or what sorts of operations we're talking >> about. > >Ahem, this is how it looks when sorted by connections, but it's >rather different when sorted by bytes downloaded. For last week, >it looks more like this: > >698 358 959 cwi.nl >523 131 718 cpe.net.cable.rogers.com >316 859 474 dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net >302 256 065 sympatico.ca >220 184 438 austin.ibm.com >208 933 189 redhat.com >175 256 836 mypointsinc.com >144 845 712 dip.t-dialin.net > >The first field is bytes transferred over the week; the second is >the domains for these sites. > >It's easy to think these sites are doing something Evil, but chances >are they're just doing some automated cvs updates on multiple >repositories once or twice a day, or they had a single big checkout >of gcc/src and a periodic cvs update or what have you. Don't read >too much into it without looking closer - I'm just providing an >example of what we do track and what we can report. Btw, just as a data point, I did make a change wrt anoncvs access last week sometime. I upped the load average block so that anoncvs would still keep working under high loads. There is still a maximum of 10 anoncvs processes possible, though. I can lower that but then the anoncvs people will be complaining. FWIW, I don't know what's special about me but I'm not seeing a problem with cvs update. Maybe I'm just hitting it at the right time. cgf