From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9961 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2002 07:50:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9954 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2002 07:50:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dublin.ACT-Europe.FR) (212.157.227.154) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Mar 2002 07:50:26 -0000 Received: from berlin.ACT-Europe.FR (berlin.int.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.169]) by dublin.ACT-Europe.FR (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30D8229EFA; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 08:50:25 +0100 (MET) Received: by berlin.ACT-Europe.FR (Postfix, from userid 507) id B079A95F; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 08:50:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 23:50:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB on true64 5.1? Message-ID: <20020328085024.A32559@act-europe.fr> References: <3CA2A856.4050809@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3CA2A856.4050809@cygnus.com>; from ac131313@cygnus.com on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 12:21:26AM -0500 X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00291.txt.bz2 > Does anyone know if it is building? I recently built it using GCC. The patch suggested by Nick was never checked in by him, but I think Andrew made the change IIRC. It should build fine with cc as well. It still has run-time problems though, but hopefully I will soon be able to suggest some patches to fix some of these. -- Joel