Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com, rth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC]
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 19:46:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020328034552.GB23767@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200203280317.WAA05137@caip.rutgers.edu>

On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 10:17:03PM -0500, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
>  > (E.g. it takes about 10x longer to do "cvs update" on the 3.0
>  > branch than the trunk.)
> 
> Yeah, what's up with that?  (I thought it was just me.)

The way RCS stores branches makes the cost of calculating diffs from a
branch tip proportional to the number of versions on the branch *and*
the distance between the branchpoint and top-of-trunk.  I imagine
update has to do diffs for some reason.

That's the problem I know about; there may be others.

zw


  reply	other threads:[~2002-03-28  3:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-27 19:17 Kaveh R. Ghazi
2002-03-27 19:46 ` Zack Weinberg [this message]
2002-03-28  1:24   ` Gerald Pfeifer
2002-03-28  1:53     ` Jason Molenda
2002-03-28  2:01       ` Jason Molenda
2002-03-28  7:17         ` Christopher Faylor
2002-03-28  9:01       ` David O'Brien
2002-03-28 21:29         ` Christopher Faylor
2002-03-28  9:00     ` David O'Brien
2002-04-03 14:19   ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-03 14:29     ` Phil Edwards
2002-03-28 12:34 ` Phil Edwards
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-27  6:01 Robert Dewar
2002-03-25 15:40 sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC Jim Blandy
2002-03-25 20:07 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-03-26 14:29   ` gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Richard Henderson
2002-03-26 14:37     ` David Edelsohn
2002-03-26 21:32       ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-03-26 15:17     ` Neil Booth
2002-03-26 15:30       ` Tom Lord
2002-03-26 15:40         ` David Edelsohn
2002-03-26 16:03           ` Tom Lord
2002-03-26 16:41             ` Tim Hollebeek
2002-03-26 22:23               ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-03-26 22:43                 ` Tom Lord
2002-03-27  7:18                   ` mike stump
2002-03-27  9:00                     ` law
2002-03-27 10:13                       ` Neil Booth
2002-03-26 22:45                 ` Tom Lord
2002-03-26 23:11                 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-03-26 23:53                   ` Tom Lord
2002-03-27  4:32                     ` Fergus Henderson
2002-03-27  6:30                     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-27  6:43                       ` Gianni Mariani
2002-03-26 22:39         ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-03-26 22:54           ` Tom Lord
2002-03-26 15:31       ` Zack Weinberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020328034552.GB23767@codesourcery.com \
    --to=zack@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu \
    --cc=jimb@redhat.com \
    --cc=rth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox