From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32656 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2002 03:17:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32629 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2002 03:17:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO caip.rutgers.edu) (128.6.236.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Mar 2002 03:17:09 -0000 Received: (from ghazi@localhost) by caip.rutgers.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA05137; Wed, 27 Mar 2002 22:17:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 19:17:00 -0000 From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" Message-Id: <200203280317.WAA05137@caip.rutgers.edu> To: zack@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com, rth@redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00286.txt.bz2 > From: Zack Weinberg > > I'll add that this is an argument for a better version control > system; most of the changes on the queue inside my head, I would > have done on a branch if CVS didn't make branches such a pain. > (E.g. it takes about 10x longer to do "cvs update" on the 3.0 > branch than the trunk.) > zw Yeah, what's up with that? (I thought it was just me.) -- Kaveh R. Ghazi Director of Systems Architecture ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu Qwest Global Services