From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-8172-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 23644 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2002 22:37:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 23565 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2002 22:37:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO igw3.watson.ibm.com) (198.81.209.18)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2002 22:37:16 -0000
Received: from sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com [9.2.112.57])
	by igw3.watson.ibm.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g2QMaXG12996;
	Tue, 26 Mar 2002 17:36:33 -0500
Received: from makai.watson.ibm.com (makai.watson.ibm.com [9.2.216.144])
	by sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g2QMaXO27234;
	Tue, 26 Mar 2002 17:36:33 -0500
Received: from watson.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by makai.watson.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.3/01-10-2000) with ESMTP id RAA26398;
	Tue, 26 Mar 2002 17:36:32 -0500
Message-Id: <200203262236.RAA26398@makai.watson.ibm.com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>, Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>,
   Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] 
In-Reply-To: Message from Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> 
   of "Tue, 26 Mar 2002 14:29:01 PST." <20020326142901.B16366@redhat.com> 
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 14:37:00 -0000
From: David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00253.txt.bz2

>>>>> Richard Henderson writes:

Richard> I think this is a mistake.  It is completely unreasonable to have
Richard> the entire "major structural changes" time period concurrent with
Richard> "please work on making a release happen".

Richard> I've been working under the assumption that the current schedule can
Richard> be changed, so that I can help Diego with the language independent
Richard> tree-ish IL after the 3.1 release.

	I agree.  We do not have enough developer bandwidth to work on
major, new changes concurrently with the release process.  Even after GCC
3.1.0 is released, we will need to assess how much effort will be required
for the GCC 3.1.1 bug-fix release the following quarter.

David