From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12856 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2002 00:41:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12793 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2002 00:41:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pcp736370pcs.reston01.va.comcast.net) (68.48.241.178) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Mar 2002 00:41:38 -0000 Received: (from tim@localhost) by pcp736370pcs.reston01.va.comcast.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA02851; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 20:01:23 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 16:41:00 -0000 From: Tim Hollebeek To: Tom Lord Cc: dje@watson.ibm.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Message-ID: <20020326200123.A2817@pcp736370pcs.reston01.va.comcast.net> Reply-To: tim@hollebeek.com References: <200203262339.SAA27636@makai.watson.ibm.com> <200203270003.QAA04072@emf.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200203270003.QAA04072@emf.net> X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00263.txt.bz2 > The approach I am suggesting is an evolutionary step beyond > the current practices and is quite consistent with the SC > development goals. The SC can and will be the judge of that. Until then, please make sure that your contributions to gcc meet or exceed your contributions to this list. -Tim