From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-8145-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 18803 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2002 18:22:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 18796 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2002 18:22:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO toenail.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2002 18:22:42 -0000
Received: (from fche@localhost)
	by toenail.toronto.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g2PIMfI07660;
	Mon, 25 Mar 2002 13:22:41 -0500
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 10:22:00 -0000
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [maint] sim and common
Message-ID: <20020325132240.D6896@redhat.com>
References: <3C85A44B.6090403@cygnus.com> <yov57koq1ck0.fsf@broadcom.com> <3C87F2DC.8070205@cygnus.com> <3C9CF23A.5040306@cygnus.com> <20020325101111.A5475@redhat.com> <3C9F62F2.9000902@cygnus.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <3C9F62F2.9000902@cygnus.com>; from ac131313@cygnus.com on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 12:48:34PM -0500
X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00226.txt.bz2


--NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-length: 421

Hi -

On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 12:48:34PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> If I understand the above correctly, your view is that, for the moment,=20
> only BenE and yourself should approve changes to src/sim/common?

Not quite - the blanket write cabal can take action too.
Anyway, "for the moment" doesn't really matter: shelve
the issue until it is made topical by the appearance of
nontrivial sim/common patches.

- FChE

--NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-length: 232

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8n2rwVZbdDOm/ZT0RAoXDAJ9aqqSJsiTXA8jMRfN6FzzbLwHhJwCggtJY
gxV9QmLlqw2axnpsvsOLVag=
=QgJG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ--