From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23917 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2002 18:52:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23910 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2002 18:52:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 23 Mar 2002 18:52:31 -0000 Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id SAA18599; Sat, 23 Mar 2002 18:52:18 GMT Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5) id xma018407; Sat, 23 Mar 02 18:51:36 GMT Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA27042; Sat, 23 Mar 2002 18:51:31 GMT Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18]) by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA23060; Sat, 23 Mar 2002 18:51:35 GMT Message-Id: <200203231851.SAA23060@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Andrew Cagney cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Organization: ARM Ltd. X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd) X-Fax: +44 1223 400410 X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ. X-Url: http://www.arm.com/ Subject: Re: Results of a multi-build (not good) In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 23 Mar 2002 13:45:12 EST." <3C9CCD38.8050003@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 10:52:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00212.txt.bz2 > > rearnsha@arm.com said: > > > >> I've just tried my multi-build script out which uses the > >> configurations specified in the MAINTAINERS file. The results aren't > >> particularly encouraging: > > > > > > So with my recent patch for PR 409 applied, things look a little more rosy: > > > > fr30-elf build failed > > m32r-elf build failed > > mn10300-elf build failed > > powerpc-eabi build failed > > sh-elf build failed > > v850-elf build failed > > Richard, > > Using Red Hat Linux 7.2, I got: > > sh-elf (will change to -w and file separate bug report) > xstormy16-elf (totally puzzling, it didn't configure!) > > but not the others. The only problem I can think of, off hand, is gmake > vs make (but this is GNU/Linux) or related (configured with absolute vs > relative paths?). I was using -j10 on the make. Maybe it's missing dependencies. R.