From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8375 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2002 18:27:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8359 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2002 18:27:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Mar 2002 18:27:22 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16oTl1-0006Lf-00; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 13:27:19 -0500 Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:27:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: "H . J . Lu" Cc: GDB Subject: Re: gdb 5.2 removes the conditional breakpoints Message-ID: <20020322132719.A24230@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: "H . J . Lu" , GDB References: <20020322095020.A12445@lucon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020322095020.A12445@lucon.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00199.txt.bz2 On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 09:50:20AM -0800, H . J . Lu wrote: > When I do > > (gdb) b 100 > (gdb) cond 1 i == 3 > (gdb) r > (gdb) r > > gdb 5.2 will remove the conditional breakpoints on Linux/x86 after I > restart the debug session. Am I the only one who sees it? Yes. It works for me. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer