From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19674 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2002 10:13:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19652 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2002 10:13:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dublin.ACT-Europe.FR) (212.157.227.154) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Mar 2002 10:13:09 -0000 Received: from berlin.ACT-Europe.FR (berlin.int.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.169]) by dublin.ACT-Europe.FR (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7F4229E1D; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:13:08 +0100 (MET) Received: by berlin.ACT-Europe.FR (Postfix, from userid 507) id 5029195F; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:13:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 02:13:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: henri delebecque Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, delebecq@supelec.fr Subject: Re: still problem with gdb 5.1.1 on alpha... Message-ID: <20020322111303.C22863@act-europe.fr> References: <20020322105648.B22863@act-europe.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020322105648.B22863@act-europe.fr>; from brobecker@ACT-Europe.FR on Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 10:56:48AM +0100 X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00190.txt.bz2 > I think that I have a patch for this one. I have a patch in the pipe > that I'd like to submit but so far I could not reproduce it without an > Ada program. Please publish your example, and I'll see if my changes fix > it. BTW, I forgot to mention that I am interested in your example because it will allow me to present my patch with a testcase that is written in something else than Ada (easier for me to add a new regression test, and also easier for the other GDB developers to reproduce it as well). -- Joel